Skip to content
QGAI.

QGAI · Quantum Generative AI Lab · Pune, India

Teaching machines toimagine in superposition, reason over entanglement, sample the impossible, compute beyond classical

I'm Prakash Gore. I build hybrid quantum-classical systems that make generative AI more data-efficient, more expressive and more trustworthy — and I engineer them to run on the hardware that exists today, not the hardware we're promised for 2035.

Active research tracks
6
Open-source research notebooks
32
Qubits in simulated circuits(sim.)
40+
Years engineering at scale
18+

About · The founder

A builder who reads the papers — and a researcher who ships.

Most quantum research never leaves the notebook. Most enterprise AI never questions its own assumptions. QGAI exists in the gap between the two.

My career began in large-scale software engineering — distributed systems, cloud platforms and the unglamorous discipline of making things work at 3 a.m. Over the years I moved from writing services to architecting AI solutions for enterprises: data platforms, ML pipelines, and, more recently, LLM and retrieval systems serving real users with real compliance constraints.

Quantum computing found me the way it finds many engineers — through a single question I couldn't let go of: if generative models are fundamentally about learning probability distributions, why are we ignoring the only computers that natively are probability distributions?

QGAI is my answer: a research lab that treats quantum computers as specialised accelerators inside AI systems, the way GPUs became accelerators for graphics and then for everything. Not hype. Not a moonshot slide. A methodical programme of experiments, benchmarks and open engineering.

Vision

“By 2030, every serious AI platform will treat the QPU as a first-class accelerator alongside the CPU and GPU. QGAI's mission is to make that integration rigorous, measurable and open — and to make sure India helps write the playbook.”

— Prakash Gore

01

Advantage must be measured

Every claim is benchmarked against the strongest classical baseline we can build — including tensor networks and GPU simulators.

02

Hybrid by default

Quantum circuits do what only they can do. Classical systems do the rest. The architecture is the innovation.

03

Open over opaque

Methods, negative results and reproducible notebooks are published. Science compounds when it is shared.

04

Engineered for noise

Designs assume NISQ-era hardware and early fault tolerance — error-aware, shallow and mitigation-ready.

Research areas

Six tracks. One hypothesis.

Generative AI is the art of learning and sampling probability distributions. Quantum computers are probability distributions. Each track tests a different consequence of that idea — with classical baselines that are hard to beat.

Innovation lab

The lab notebook, open.

Every experiment starts with a falsifiable hypothesis and ends with a result — positive or not. Here's what's on the bench right now.

Live experiment log

6 active

  • EXP-014

    Quantum RAG

    QUBO context packing for multi-hop RAG

    H₁: Jointly optimising relevance and redundancy beats greedy MMR on multi-hop questions at equal token budget.

    Validating72%

    updated 2026-10

  • EXP-011

    Synthetic Data

    Born-machine priors for low-data tabular synthesis

    H₁: A 12–20 qubit QCBM prior improves rare-category coverage versus a matched classical prior.

    Prototyping48%

    updated 2026-09

  • EXP-009

    Quantum + HPC

    Latency budget of cloud QPUs in variational loops

    H₁: Queue and transfer overheads, not gate time, dominate wall-clock for VQE-style loops — and are schedulable.

    Validating81%

    updated 2026-10

  • EXP-007

    Knowledge Graphs

    Density-matrix embeddings for polysemous entities

    H₁: Mixed-state embeddings outperform point vectors on link prediction for multi-sense entities.

    Exploring26%

    updated 2026-08

  • EXP-005

    Quantum-AI Convergence

    Verifier-in-the-loop circuit generation agent

    H₁: An LLM agent with simulator feedback produces shallower circuits than one-shot generation.

    Prototyping55%

    updated 2026-10

  • EXP-003

    Quantum GenAI

    Barren-plateau map of shallow generative ansätze

    H₁: Problem-inspired, local-cost ansätze retain trainable gradients up to ~30 qubits in simulation.

    Piloting90%

    updated 2026-07

Open Benchmarks

A reproducible suite comparing quantum and classical generative models on equal footing — including negative results.

Quantum Readiness Programme

Working sessions that help engineering teams identify realistic quantum use-cases and post-quantum migration needs.

Bharat Quantum Builders

Mentoring and open notebooks for Indian students and engineers entering quantum software, aligned with the National Quantum Mission's talent goals.

Technology exploration · on the radar

  • Post-quantum cryptography migration patterns for AI platforms
  • Tensor networks as the honest classical baseline
  • Quantum reservoir computing for time-series
  • Photonic and neutral-atom hardware trade-offs
  • Error-mitigation cost models (ZNE, PEC, PEA)
  • qLDPC codes and what they mean for software timelines

Projects showcase

From hypothesis to running system.

Research becomes real when it has an architecture, an API and an honest metric. Each project below has all three.

6 projects shown

  • QuantumGenAI
    Prototyping

    Q-Sampler

    A hybrid generative engine that plugs a quantum circuit Born machine in as a learnable prior for classical decoders.

    Rare-mode coveragetarget
    +15–25%
    Qubits (simulated)benchmark
    8–24
    Baselines tracked
    4
    • PennyLane
    • PyTorch
    • CUDA-Q
    • Weights & Biases
    • Docker
  • HybridGenAI
    Validating

    EntangledRAG

    A retrieval layer that formulates context selection as a QUBO and solves it with QAOA, annealing or a classical fallback.

    Context redundancytarget
    −30%
    Candidate poolbenchmark
    ≤64
    Solver back-ends
    3
    • Qiskit
    • D-Wave Ocean
    • pgvector
    • LangGraph
    • FastAPI
    • Next.js
  • HybridPlatform
    Validating

    QHPC Orchestrator

    A scheduler that co-locates GPU simulation and cloud-QPU jobs, routing each circuit by cost, fidelity and queue time.

    Idle queue timetarget
    −40%
    Providers abstracted
    3
    Shot budget savedtarget
    20%+
    • Kubernetes
    • Ray
    • Qiskit Runtime
    • Amazon Braket
    • Prometheus
    • Go
  • QuantumPlatform
    Prototyping

    QSynth

    A privacy-first synthetic tabular data toolkit with quantum copula generators and built-in utility and privacy reports.

    Tail fidelitytarget
    +20%
    Privacy budget εtarget
    ≤ 3
    Report metrics
    12
    • Qiskit
    • SDV
    • Opacus
    • Polars
    • Streamlit
  • GenAIQuantum
    Prototyping

    Qircuit Copilot

    An agentic assistant that drafts, simulates and optimises quantum circuits — every suggestion is verified before it is shown.

    Circuit depthtarget
    −25%
    Verified outputs
    100%
    Task benchmarktarget
    150 tasks
    • Claude / LLM APIs
    • Qiskit
    • Aer
    • Tool-use agents
    • TypeScript
  • QuantumGenAI
    Exploring

    Hilbert KG

    Quantum-inspired knowledge graph embeddings that model ambiguity as mixed states, feeding a GraphRAG pipeline.

    Link-prediction MRRtarget
    +8%
    Entities (pilot)target
    50k
    Embedding families
    3
    • PyKEEN
    • PyTorch (complex)
    • Neo4j
    • pgvector
    • LlamaIndex

Research impact dashboard

Progress you can audit.

Output metrics for the open research programme, refreshed monthly.

32

Notebooks open-sourced

Reproducible, with seeds and baselines

≥ 3

Classical baselines per study

Including tensor-network simulation

9

Negative results published

Because null results save others months

120+

Engineers mentored

Through workshops and open sessions

Simulated circuit runs per month (thousands)

May–Oct 2026 · 199k total · +206% over the period

0204060MayJunJulAugSepOct55k
View as table
MonthRuns (k)
May 202618
Jun 202624
Jul 202631
Aug 202629
Sep 202642
Oct 202655

Technology stack

An ecosystem, not a toolbox.

Hybrid research lives at the seams between ecosystems. Select any technology to trace how it connects across quantum, AI and cloud.

Quantum

Cloud

AI

How to read this map

Each column is an ecosystem; each curve is a working integration used in at least one QGAI project. Hover, tap or tab through nodes to trace a dependency chain.

Future roadmap · 2027 → 2030

The decade the QPU joins the stack.

A forecast is a hypothesis with a deadline. Here is ours — what we expect the industry to do, and what QGAI commits to building.

  1. 2027

    Utility in the loop

    Industry prediction

    Early fault-tolerant demonstrations with tens of logical qubits become routine. Hybrid quantum-HPC centres move from pilots to shared research infrastructure, and India's National Quantum Mission platforms reach the intermediate scale.

    QGAI research direction

    Publish the QGAI open benchmark for quantum generative models. Ship EntangledRAG and QHPC Orchestrator as open-source reference implementations.

  2. 2028

    The QPU becomes an accelerator

    Industry prediction

    Major AI and cloud platforms expose QPUs through the same schedulers as GPUs. First credible, narrowly-scoped advantage results in chemistry sampling and optimisation sub-routines.

    QGAI research direction

    Industry pilots of quantum synthetic data in finance and healthcare. Release a quantum-programming benchmark for code models.

  3. 2029

    Logical-qubit software

    Industry prediction

    Software shifts from physical-gate thinking to logical-qubit abstractions. Error-correction decoding — often AI-driven — becomes a core part of the stack. Post-quantum cryptography migration deadlines force enterprise action.

    QGAI research direction

    Port QGAI models to logical-qubit back-ends. Launch a quantum-AI convergence fellowship with Indian universities.

  4. 2030

    Quantum-native AI

    Industry prediction

    Hundreds of logical qubits make genuinely quantum generative models — not just quantum-inspired ones — testable at meaningful scale. AI and quantum co-design each other.

    QGAI research direction

    Quantum-native foundation components: priors, samplers and reasoning modules deployed inside production AI systems.

Calibrated predictions

Stated confidence that each holds by end of 2030 — we'll score ourselves publicly.

  • The first commercially meaningful quantum advantage will be in sampling, not search.

    70%
  • Most 'quantum AI' value before 2030 will come from quantum-inspired classical algorithms.

    80%
  • AI-driven decoders will be standard in fault-tolerant control stacks.

    65%
  • India will host at least one globally-relevant quantum software company by 2030.

    60%

Contact & collaboration

Build the quantum-AI stack with us.

Universities, research labs, enterprises and event organisers — tell us what you're working on. Every message is read by Prakash personally.

Enquiry type

We usually reply within 3 working days.